Evolution

  • Evolution
  • Evolution
  • Evolution
  • Evolution
Case Reports
Publications
Videos
  • Tissue origin :
    Heterologous pericardium
  • Tissue collagen :
    Preserved
  • Physical form :
    Dried membrane with one smooth side and one
    micro-rough side
  • Composition :
    100% pericardium
  • Thickness :
    0.3 mm (±0.1 mm)
  • Estimated resorption :
    About 3 months
  • Packaging :
    40x40 mm, 80x60 mm
  • Product codes :
    EV04LLE | 1 Blister | 40x40 mm | Equine
    EV06LLE | 1 Blister | 80x60 mm | Equine
  • GMDN code : 38746
Characteristics
Obtained from mesenchymal tissue (heterologous pericardium) the Evolution membrane is completely resorbable1. Its structure is made of dense collagen fibers of high consistency and of extraordinary resistance that offer the specialist surgeon:
- maximum adaptability to bone tissue and soft tissues
- easy and secure suturability to nearby tissues
- best membrane/bone and membrane/periosteum interface
- stability and prolonged protection of the underlying graft2.
Handling
The membrane can be shaped with sterile scissors until the desired size is reached; it must then be rehydrated with lukewarm physiological solution.
Once it acquires the desired plasticity, it must be adapted to the grafting site.
N.B.: in case of accidental exposure, the dense collagenic matrix of Evolution protects the graft from infection; the membrane itself will also not be infected, allowing second intention healing3,4.
Clinical indications
Oral surgery and traumatology: always recommended in case of large
regenerations with risks of exposure.
Bibliography
1 NANNMARK U, SENNERBY L
THE BONE TISSUE RESPONSES TO PREHYDRATED AND COLLAGENATED CORTICO-CANCELLOUS PORCINE BONE GRAFTS. A STUDY IN RABBIT MAXILLARY DEFECTS
CLIN IMPLANT DENT RELAT RES, 2008 DEC;10(4):264-70

2 CARDAROPOLI D, CARDAROPOLI G
HEALING OF GINGIVAL RECESSIONS USING A COLLAGEN MEMBRANE WITH A DEMINERALIZED XENOGRAFT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
INT J PERIODONTICS RESTORATIVE DENT, 2009 FEB; 29(1):59-67

3 BARONE A, BORGIA V, COVANI U, RICCI M, PIATTELLI A, IEZZI G
FLAP VERSUS FLAPLESS PROCEDURE FOR RIDGE PRESERVATION IN ALVEOLAR EXTRACTION SOCKETS: A HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATION IN A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
CLIN ORAL IMPLANTS RES, 2014 MAR 1 EPUB AHEAD OF PRINT

4 BARONE A, RICCI M, TONELLI P, SANTINI S, COVANI U
TISSUE CHANGES OF EXTRACTION SOCKETS IN HUMANS: A COMPARISON OF SPONTANEOUS HEALING VS. RIDGE PRESERVATION WITH SECONDARY SOFT TISSUE HEALING
CLIN ORAL IMPLANTS RES, 2012 JUL 12, EPUB AHEAD OF PRINT
© 2017 Copyright by Tecnoss Dental Srl. P.I. 08917490016. All rights reserved.. Web Site producted by DSI Design